The Rainforest Mock World Summit Fall 1999

 

Hydro Power to The Rescue

 

                                                                      Student 13

 

The rainforests of the world are filled with exotic species of plants and animals, but they are also full of potential energy sources that can be harvested to supply the world.  Using the resources in the rainforests can help eliminate some of the environmental hazards that plague the earth.  Being able to breathe clean air should be a part of our reality, but in the society we live in, how much of the air is really clean?  I feel that it is my duty as a hydro-electric representative of Georgia Power to participate in establishing more hydro-electric power plants across the globe.  Despite this fact, I also believe that preserving the rainforest is also a top priority.

 

Capturing and converting the kinetic energy from rivers, streams, and lakes is an effective way of supplying electricity to societies while preserving the air.  The use of fossil fuels is polluting the air and water supply, and with the deforestation of the rainforest, things do not seem to be getting any better.  By using the hydro-electric plants, cities can get their desired amount of power without the use of fossil fuel.  With an increase of dams, there would surely be a decline in the amount of fossil fuels consumed.  Hydro-electric power is the world=s largest renewable source of electricity at the moment.  In Canada, this power accounts for 60% of the nation=s electrical needs.  With the continuing destruction of the rainforest, how can the remaining portion of the rainforest possibly purify the air?  The only way this need can be met is with a proposal of more hydro-electric plants and a decrease of fossil fuel consumption.

 

In order to build more hydroelectric plants, more land would have to be cleared, but not as much as for other sources.  There should be a balance in the amount of trees that are cleared and the trees that are remaining.  Laws should be heavily enforced on timber companies concerning the amount of lumber they consume.  The trees that are removed for the building of hydropower plants can be sold to a timber company.  This could help to solve the problems of air pollution and curtail some of the soil erosion that is occurring around the globe.

 

An example of a community that utilizes hydro power and encourages forest conservation is the village of Megkawayan, on the island of Mindanao, fifty kilometers away from the largest city in the southern Philippines.  This community uses a small stream to generate electricity from micro-hydro electric power plant, which the community controls and maintains themselves.  The system generates 3.5 kilowatts of power, enough power to light a small city.  This example encourages the preservation of the environment.  Without the cover of the forest, it is unlikely that the water supply would last for long in this area.  The use of this renewable energy source is a sign of progress, preserving the forest and improving living conditions for the community.  Compared to a large-scale hydroelectric damns, micro-hydro systems encourage the community to preserve its forest.  Without the cover of the forest in the water catchment area supply, the stream or river there would not provide enough water to power the hydro system.

 


Hydroelectric power plants can be divided into two categories: high head and low head.  High head power plants are the most common hydro power plants.  These plants are usually equipped with a dam to store water.  One benefit of having a dam is the ability to store water during rainy periods, and being able to release water during dry periods.  Due to this situation, high head power plants are able to meet high demands and provide consistent and reliable production of electricity.  High head plants with storage are very valuable to power companies, because of their ability to adjust to meet the electrical demand on a distribution system. 

 

The other type of power plant is the low head power plant.  In the previous example concerning the village of Megkawayan, the community was supplying their electrical needs from a low head power plant.  This type of plant does not have dams or reservoirs.  Low head power plants utilize small rivers or streams to power their system.  Low head power plants have a smaller impact on its environment than the high head power plants.  Low head plants are better suited for preserving the environment than high head plants, but high head plants can provide more electric power and some relief during dry periods and standardized turbine production better than low head turbine, lowering the cost of hydroelectric power at sites.  Also important is the use of new computerized control systems and improved turbines, which may allow more electricity to be generated from existing facilities in the future.

 

One bad example of a hydroelectric power plant that had a negative effect on its environment is the Bakun Dam Project.  The Malaysian government of Sarawak, on the Island of Borneo, made plans to build a hydro-electric dam on the Rajang River.  In the Bakun Dam Project, there were several key issues that failed to be addressed, namely the impact of the dam on downstream ecosystems and the lack of adequate data regarding the rate the reservoir would fill with sediment.  With the trapping of river sediment, there would be a reduction in power production from the dam, and the rate of erosion would increase, affecting the downstream riverbed, banks, and deltas.  This disaster would harm the food chain of this environment.  The people of this area ended up culturally destitute, economically impoverished, and psychologically traumatized.  The natives, the Long Bulan Kenyah People, felt as though they were not given any information on the dam project and many of the questions they asked were not answered.  How could an organization just come along and force a community to relocate and throw away its values and way of life?  The tribal leader stated that a Agovernment official came to visit us...He warned us that if we spoke against the project {we} would be blacklisted.@

 

Hydroelectric power is not a perfect supply of power, but compared to other sources, it is a whole lot closer to perfection than burning coal, oil, or natural gas.  Hydropower does not emit carbon dioxide or sulfur dioxide like coal and oil burning.  Also, hydropower does not contribute to global warming or acid rain like the consumption of fossil fuel burning.  Still hydroelectric power has its drawbacks, including the decay of vegetation, the flooding of vast areas of land, and flooding of the homelands of native people.  Some rare ecosystems are threatened by hydroelectric development, but improvements are being made.  Other examples of the negative effects include the amount of silt that is trapped by a dam that slowly fills up reservoirs,  preventing fish from migrating upstream.  Also, bacteria from decaying vegetation can change mercury, which is present in rocks under lying reservoir, into a form which is soluble in water.

 


As a representative of the hydroelectric power company, we are making progress in preventing the build up of silt in our dams.  Georgia Power has come up with ways to allow the silt to travel on downstream to prevent build up in the dam reservoirs.  Twice a month, chemists are sent to the reservoirs to check for any mercury accumulation in the water.  To prevent the flooding of certain areas, the dam will be allowed to run at a minimum capacity.

 

The use of small and low head hydro systems would have been a better solution for acquiring electrical power in the Bakun Dam Project.  The Malaysian government should have provided the area with proposals of small scale and low head hydro systems to meet their demands.  By using these micro-hydro systems, the ecosystem of the Malaysian province of Sarawak would have been maintained with probably minimum negative effect to the environment.  The government could have set up small stations near the systems to be properly maintained.  Working to preserve the forest would encourage the native to contribute their own free time to help out with the power plants.  This would have provided extra manpower for the government and allowed natives to continue with their customs and way of life. 

 

The Brazillian government has built several hydroelectric dams.  These dams have destroyed several thousand hectares of rain forests, and they have led to the flooding of certain Indian reserves.  The Balbina Dam on the Rio Uatuma in the state of Amazonas is one of the Brazilian=s government dams that turned out to be a disaster. The dam flooded an area of 236,000 hectares of forest.  This dam was another example of improper planning and construction that destroyed a large area of forest.  With the proper proposals, this government could have set up micro-hydro plants along several of the rivers to accumulate the electrical power needed.  Following this idea, the forest would have been preserved, along with the plant and animal species, not to mention of the natives of this area.  Considering all of the resources this dam destroyed, it only produced about 32% of its proposed electricity generating capacity (the average Brazilian dam produces 50-60% of its proposed capacity).

 

The use of large hydro plants is not a good idea at the moment.  There are many problems that need to be addressed with the use of high head power plants.  Maybe with further development we can return to the use of high head hydroelectric power, but at the present time we should focus on the low head power plants.  With the use of low head plants, we can conserve our forests while providing electricity to our cities.  With the protection of the forest, the rivers and streams provide a constant flow of water to the plants and animals, while maintaining a balance of life in the environment.  Hydroelectric power has been around since 1882, providing reliable, cost effective electricity which will continue into the future.  The environmental impact of hydropower is very different than those of fossil fuel power plants.  Some might see hydroelectric plants as destroying the forest, but as a representative of a hydroelectric power company, I see hydropower helping to sustain the remaining forest, and water supplies, while providing electricity for home.  Compared to the use of fossil fuels, it is a sign of good things to come in our future.

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

                                                                     Work Cited

 

1.                  Http://www.caa.org.au/horizons/h25/power.html

 

2.                  Http://www.ei.educ.ab.ca/sch/sht/Destruction-Rain-Forest.html

 

3.                  Http://www.iclei.org/efacts/hydroele.htm

 

4.                  Http://www.ran.org/ran/info_center/wrr/wrr_95_10.html

 

5.                  Http://www.worldwrite.org.uk/site/brazil/dam.html