|
Student 29(question 5) In your own words, describe your self-portrait and the style of art it represents. Please try to explain your use of line, shape, color and texture and what is conveys to you. (question 6)Please explain how you used ideas from the resources on the self we studied. Did you consciously use ideas from or react to any of the following resources in your self-portrait: the psychological theories of self? The Rilke discussion of "faces," "hands," or "costumes"? The Asian views of the self? The examples from art of non-representational self-portraits? Please clearly explain what ideas from these sources you integrated into your self-portrait and why. You could say my project is similar to Rilke because it presents my personality in levels. What I seem on the exterior is not necessarily what I am inside. It also is reminiscent of Newton's view of an ordered universe. The black on the edges of my portrait is not me, but rather an area like outer space. The 'telescope' is me. In my opinion, we are fortunate as humans to be floating out there in a world full of millions of people and be lucky enough to collide with others on our journey. We become even more fortunate when we are able to get to know and understand the inner-selves of others. (question 7) In what ways do these different disciplinary resources agree with one another on the question of what is the self? Rilke and the Hindu religion are kind of similar in that they believe the self has not reached their full potential. I believe Rilke portrayed this in 'faces' with the woman who held her face in her hands. By peering into her bloody face we see her inner struggle. In 'costumes' he portrayed this by desribing how we hide our feelings. In the Hindu religion everyone is essentially the same and their goal is to reach union with reality. (question 11) In our unit on the self, is there a right answer to the question of what the self is? If not, what is your reaction to our inability to provide a clear answer one way or the other on this issue? I believe that the self is something undefinable. Like when we studied Michelangelo, to define the self would be to limit it. This would be especially detrimental because the self is always learning new things (whether through positive or negative experiences) and changing.
|
|
Explorations in Interdisciplinary Teaching and Learning Home Page |