1. In your own words, what does the word "interdisciplinary" mean? What
do you think an interdisciplinary class is or should be?
2. How does an interdisciplinary class differ from the
traditional classes you take in the disciplines?
3. Do the two instructors you had this semester represent
the different viewpoints of their disciplines to you? (Dr. Farrar is in
art and Dr. Vess is in history)
4. Does this class seem to use resources from multiple
disciplines and to present perspectives from multiple disciplines? Can
you give an example?
5. In your own words, please describe your self-portrait,
and the style of art it represents. Please try to explain your use of
line, shape, color,and texture and what it conveys about you.
6. Please explain how you used ideas from the resources
on the self that we studied. Did you consciously use ideas from or react
to any of the following resources in your self-portrait: the psychological
theories of the self? The Rilke discussion of "faces," "hands," or "costumes"?
The Asian views of the self? The examples from art of non-representational
self-portraits? Please clearly explain what ideas from these sources you
integrated into your self-portrait and why.
7. In what ways do those different disciplinary resources
agree with one another on question of what is the self?
8. In what ways do they conflict with each other on
the question of what is the self?
9. Does your self-portrait try to reconcile these ideas
or did you choose a particular position to convey? Why?
10. Were there any units or topics in the course where
the instructor(s)presented conflicting ideas/perspectives on the topic?
Given an example.
11. In our unit on the self, is there a right answer
to the question of what the self is? If not, what is your reaction to
our inability to provide a clear answer one way or the other on this issue?
12.Is there anything you would like to add about your
experience in this IDST course?
13. Do you think this course might change your performance
in other classes? Why or why not?
Please respond to the following questions about the use of nuclear energy.
We are not concerned with how much information you have about any issue,
but how you think about the issue. Read the statement of the problem,
and then respond to the questions.
Problem
Most historians claim that the pyramids were built as tombs for kings
by the ancient Egyptians, using human labor, and aided by ropes, pulleys,
and rollers. Others have suggested that the Egyptians cold not have built
such huge structures by themselves, for they had neither the mathematical
knowledge, the necessary tools, not an adequate source of power.
Respond to the following questions:
P1. What do you think about these statements?
P2. How did you come to hold that point of view?
P3. On what do you base that point of view?
P4. Can you ever know for sure that your position on
this issue is correct? How or why not?
P5. When two people differ about matters such as this,
is it the case the one opinion is right and one is wrong? If yes, what
do you mean by "right"? If no, can you say that one opinion is in some
way better than the other? What do you mean by "better"?
P6. How is it possible that people have different points
of view about this subject?
P7. How is it possible that experts in the field disagree
about this subject?
FAP Online Interview