Sample Writing Problems:
A Poorly Written Essay
This is an example of a very poorly written essay. Be sure to check the list of
pointers at the end of the file so that you can avoid making the same mistakes.
Discuss the events which led to the conversion of Constantine,
its nature and the impact of his treatment of the church on the
church/state relationship which characterized the Middle Ages.
Specifically, what role did the heresies play in the development
of Constantine's control of the Church and in the relationship
between the church and state?
Constantine converted to Christianity at the Battle of Milvian
Bridge. (NO DATE) He saw a sign in the sky. (WHAT SIGN, WHAT
DID IT MEAN?) Then he issued the Edict of Milan which made
Christianity legal. (NO DATE, OTHER PROVISION) He thought his
power depended on his protection of the Christian faith. (WHY?)
So when heresies arose, he stamped them out. Like the Donatist
heresy and the Arian heresy. The Donatists did not want anyone
who was not perfect to be a priest or bishop (HOW DID THE HERESY
BEGIN? WHO WERE THE PARTIES INVOLVED, WHAT WERE THEY CALLED AND WHAT DID THEY BELIEVE AND WHY?) and the Arians thought that Christ was
simply a creature (WHY? WHAT DID HE SAY EXACTLY? WHAT WERE THE
PROBLEMS WITH SUCH A VIEW?). Constantine abolished both of them.
(WHY? AND HOW? COUNCILS?) So he was the head of the church (WHAT
IS THE WORD FOR THIS FORM OF GOVERNMENT?), and in the Middle
Ages,the Church and the state were close together. (EXAMPLES)
This is an example of an essay which makes all the relevant
points, yet is very weak in overall content.
This is a poor essay because:
1. no dates.
2. mentions IMPORTANT events and does not explain them --
compare the sections on the Donatist and Arian heresies
above.
3. incomplete definition of Edict of Milan -- compare
definition in first essay.
4. Does not tell the full story -- compare account of
Constantine's conversion and his treatment of the
heresies to the essay above.
5. Does not explain WHY Constantine was seen as the head of
the Church, nor WHY his actions had such an impact on
future church/state relations, nor HOW those relations
were expressed in the later Middle Ages (compare
sections on Theodosian Code above).